EVALUATION CRITERIA

The evaluation criteria of the NCSC are designed to judge how well a child’s project reflects scientific thinking, originality, and social relevance.

Core Evaluation Criteria

  1. Originality of Idea and Concept
    • The project must be new, innovative, and not copied
    • It should arise from curiosity and aim to answer a clear question (hypothesis)
    • Evaluators may ask: How did you get this idea?
  2. Relevance to Theme
    • The project must clearly connect to the annual focal theme/sub-theme
  3. Scientific Understanding
    • Shows understanding of concepts, principles, and reasoning behind the project
  4. Data Collection
    • Data must be collected systematically
    • Methods include surveys, interviews, and observations
    • Sample size should be adequate and meaningful
  5. Analysis of Data
    • Data should be organized using tables and charts
    • Proper classification and interpretation is required
    • Basic statistics can be used
  6. Experimentation / Validation
    • Includes experiments or field studies to test ideas
    • Can be simple, low-cost, and locally designed
  7. Interpretation & Problem-Solving
    • Should answer the original question
    • Offer solutions to a local problem
  8. Teamwork
    • Evaluates cooperation between team members
    • Division of work and collective effort
  9. Background Correction (District Level Only)
    • Extra weightage for students from remote or disadvantaged areas
    • Includes limited resources or infrastructure
    • Focus on fairness and inclusivity
  10. Report and Presentation
    • Written report with clarity, structure, and documentation
    • Oral presentation with communication and response to questions
    • Maintaining a logbook (daily diary) is compulsory
Additional Criteria
  1. Follow-up Action Plan (State Level)
    • Proposed solutions
    • Implementation in the community
  2. Improvement from Previous Level
    • Continuous improvement from District → State → National level
  3. Additional Documentation
    • Explanation of changes made after evaluator feedback
Evaluation Focus
  • Scientific thinking
  • Local problem-solving
  • Creativity and originality
  • Practical and simple solutions
In short:

Think scientifically, act locally, and explain clearly.